PXP site audit

Automated scans of 7 key pages across mobile, run .

Automated checks only. These cover part of WCAG — a manual review covers what a machine can't test, such as keyboard operation, focus order and whether alt text is meaningful.

Average scores

Performance
73 mobile
Accessibility
91 mobile
Best Practices
100 mobile
SEO
100 mobile
Agentic Browsing
1/2 mobile

Scores by page

Lighthouse category scores, 0–100. 90+   50–89   under 50
Agentic Browsing is scored as a fraction of checks passed rather than out of 100.
Page Mobile
Perf A11y BP SEO Agent
Homepage / Open Homepage on the live site, opens in a new tab Performance 92 , good Accessibility 89 , needs improvement Best Practices 100 , good SEO 100 , good Agentic Browsing 1 of 2 checks passed , needs improvement
Website Design services/website-design Open Website Design on the live site, opens in a new tab Performance 65 , needs improvement Accessibility 92 , good Best Practices 100 , good SEO 100 , good Agentic Browsing 1 of 2 checks passed , needs improvement
Website Development services/website-development Open Website Development on the live site, opens in a new tab Performance 63 , needs improvement Accessibility 92 , good Best Practices 100 , good SEO 100 , good Agentic Browsing 1 of 2 checks passed , needs improvement
Ecommerce services/ecommerce Open Ecommerce on the live site, opens in a new tab Performance 64 , needs improvement Accessibility 92 , good Best Practices 100 , good SEO 100 , good Agentic Browsing 1 of 2 checks passed , needs improvement
Webmaster Services services/webmaster-services Open Webmaster Services on the live site, opens in a new tab Performance 68 , needs improvement Accessibility 92 , good Best Practices 100 , good SEO 100 , good Agentic Browsing 1 of 2 checks passed , needs improvement
Content Writing services/content-writing Open Content Writing on the live site, opens in a new tab Performance 66 , needs improvement Accessibility 92 , good Best Practices 100 , good SEO 100 , good Agentic Browsing 1 of 2 checks passed , needs improvement
Get More Info get-more-info Open Get More Info on the live site, opens in a new tab Performance 94 , good Accessibility 88 , needs improvement Best Practices 100 , good SEO 100 , good Agentic Browsing 1 of 2 checks passed , needs improvement

Most widespread issues

6 distinct checks fail somewhere on the site. These affect the most pages — fixing them once in a shared template usually clears them everywhere.

Links do not have a discernible name

Link text (and alternate text for images, when used as links) that is discernible, unique, and focusable improves the navigation experience for screen reader users. Learn how to...

serious 7 pages 7 elements

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Low-contrast text is difficult or impossible for many users to read. Learn how to provide sufficient color contrast.

serious 1 page 3 elements

`[aria-hidden="true"]` elements contain focusable descendents

Focusable descendents within an `[aria-hidden="true"]` element prevent those interactive elements from being available to users of assistive technologies like screen r...

serious 1 page 1 element

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Properly ordered headings that do not skip levels convey the semantic structure of the page, making it easier to navigate and understand when using assistive technologies. Learn...

moderate 7 pages 7 elements

Document does not have a main landmark.

One main landmark helps screen reader users navigate a web page. Learn more about landmarks.

moderate 7 pages 7 elements

Accessibility tree is not well-formed

A well-formed accessibility tree helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page.

unrated 7 pages page-level

See all 6 issues

Link integrity

1 broken link across 9 crawled pages (0 pointing at this site, 1 pointing elsewhere). A further 2 could not be confirmed either way and are listed separately rather than counted as faults.

See all link findings

Notes

Site audit, November 2, 2026.